Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHong, Hoon
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-31T13:40:37Z
dc.date.available2016-05-31T13:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.issn1311-9206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10610/1985
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that both Marx and Hayek objected to the dichotomy between physis and nomos, and offered concepts which integrate, or mediate between, the two. Marx's value forms and Hayek's rules aim to grasp something neither purely natural nor purely artificial or social, but "socially natural". Value forms and rules are natural in the sense that they pre-exist the agents and are taken by the agents as given. On the other hand, forms and rules are social in that productions relations or spontaneous order are reproduced as the unintended consequences of the agents' using forms or following rules. Thus value forms and rules stand as links between agents and production relations or spontaneous order.bg_BG
dc.language.isoenbg_BG
dc.publisherАИ "Ценов"bg_BG
dc.subjectMarxbg_BG
dc.subjectHayekbg_BG
dc.subjectKeynesbg_BG
dc.subjectvalue formsbg_BG
dc.subjectrulesbg_BG
dc.titleMARX'S VALUE FORMS AND HAYEK'S RULES: A REINTERPRETATION IN THE LIGHT OF THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN PHYSIS AND NOMOSbg_BG
dc.typeArticlebg_BG


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record