Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlock, Walter
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-07T07:53:49Z
dc.date.available2016-06-07T07:53:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1311-9206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10610/2262
dc.description.abstractCoase (1960) claimed that in the zero costs world, it would not matter for the allocation of resources which of two disputants were awarded the relevant property rights. Block (1977) disputed this, on the ground that it assumed that both parties would have the wherewithal with which to make the relevant bribe. Demsetz (1977) maintained that Block (1977) failed to reckon with Coase‘s (1960) explicit assumption of no wealth effects. Block (1995) disputed this claim of Demsetz‘s (1977), claiming the Coase (1960) anticipated no such thing. The next round in this debate was Demsetz (1997) who reiterated his position, followed by Block (2000) in a response to Demsetz (1997). Brook (2007) mostly takes Demsetz‘s (1977, 1997) side of this ongoing discussion. The present paper is a rejoinder to Brook (2007), supporting Block (1997, 1995, 2000).bg_BG
dc.language.isoenbg_BG
dc.publisherАИ "Ценов"bg_BG
dc.subjectCoasebg_BG
dc.subjectzero costsbg_BG
dc.subjectpositive costsbg_BG
dc.subjectwealth effectsbg_BG
dc.subjectindifference curvesbg_BG
dc.titleA RESPONSE TO BROOKS' SUPPORT OF DEMSETZ ON THE COASE THEOREMbg_BG
dc.typeArticlebg_BG


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record