Показване на основна информация на публикация

dc.contributor.authorCLÉMENT-PITIOT, Hélène
dc.contributor.authorSAINT-PIERRE, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-20T06:45:58Z
dc.date.available2016-05-20T06:45:58Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1314-3123
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10610/1724
dc.description.abstractOur contribution aims to revisit the well known Goodwin’s model in macroeconomics by the light of set-valued analysis taking into account state and regulation constraints in a viability program. The model of Goodwin (1967) deals with dynamic interactions between employment and salary levels. It provides endogenous explanations of cyclical trends in dynamical economy. Viability methods enable investigating model properties and revealing appropriate regulation allowing the evolution to ffiulll some prescribed qualitative objective. Then, applying computational methods derived from the Viability Kernel Algorithm, one can stretch the traditional Goodwin model analysis up to the institutional framework of the economy including monetary and budgetary aspects of the regulation policy from the public authorities, namely the state government, the central bank and eventually the rivalry between the two boards thanks to dynamical gamesbg_BG
dc.language.isoenbg_BG
dc.publisherАИ "Ценов"bg_BG
dc.relation.ispartofseries1;10
dc.subjectGoodwin modelbg_BG
dc.subjectviability kernelbg_BG
dc.subjectregulation policybg_BG
dc.subjectviability of evolutionsbg_BG
dc.subjectbudgetary and monetary regulation toolsbg_BG
dc.titleINFLATION AND LABOUR CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION: THE VIABLE COMPROMISESbg_BG
dc.typeArticlebg_BG


Файлове в тази публикация

Thumbnail

Тази публикация се показва в следните колекции

Показване на основна информация на публикация