• English
    • български
  • English 
    • English
    • български
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Статии
  • Списание "Диалог"
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Статии
  • Списание "Диалог"
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A RESPONSE TO BROOKS' SUPPORT OF DEMSETZ ON THE COASE THEOREM

Thumbnail
View/Open
DialogueBook2eng2010_65_80.pdf (271.8Kb)
Date
2010
Author
Block, Walter
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Coase (1960) claimed that in the zero costs world, it would not matter for the allocation of resources which of two disputants were awarded the relevant property rights. Block (1977) disputed this, on the ground that it assumed that both parties would have the wherewithal with which to make the relevant bribe. Demsetz (1977) maintained that Block (1977) failed to reckon with Coase‘s (1960) explicit assumption of no wealth effects. Block (1995) disputed this claim of Demsetz‘s (1977), claiming the Coase (1960) anticipated no such thing. The next round in this debate was Demsetz (1997) who reiterated his position, followed by Block (2000) in a response to Demsetz (1997). Brook (2007) mostly takes Demsetz‘s (1977, 1997) side of this ongoing discussion. The present paper is a rejoinder to Brook (2007), supporting Block (1997, 1995, 2000).
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10610/2262
Collections
  • Списание "Диалог"

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceSections & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Contact Us | Send Feedback