Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlock, Walter
dc.contributor.authorWirth, Harold
dc.contributor.authorButt, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-09T12:35:38Z
dc.date.available2016-06-09T12:35:38Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1311-9206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10610/2380
dc.description.abstractO’Neill (2010) is a critique of Block (1980) and, also, I argue, a supporter of Nozick’s (1977) criticism of the Austrian School of economics. O’Neill (2010) also calls into question Hoppe (2005, 2009). These latter two articles also constitute a disparagement of Nozick (1980). While I agree with several of O’Neill’s (2010) condemnations of Hoppe (2005, 2009), at least the latter author was attempting to respond to Nozick’s (1977) denigration of praxeology, thus defending Austrianism. The same, unfortunately, cannot be said of O’Neill’s (2010) overall rejection of Hoppe (2005, 2009). The present paper is an attempt to defend Block (1980) against the rejection of it by O’Neill (2010).bg_BG
dc.language.isoenbg_BG
dc.publisherАИ "Ценов"bg_BG
dc.subjectIndifferencebg_BG
dc.subjectpreferencebg_BG
dc.subjecteconomic goodbg_BG
dc.subjectchoicebg_BG
dc.titleRESPONSE TO BEN O’NEILL ON INDIFFERENCEbg_BG
dc.typeArticlebg_BG


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record